Action and Dull Wit Dominate in Sherlock Holmes
By Morgan P Salvo
Ye gad! Guy Ritchie made a kid’s movie in the same vein as Pirates of
the Caribbean. Sherlock Holmes gives the feeling of a Disney ride –not
to mention a Ritchie film with uncharacteristic straight-forward
storytelling and no cursing. As Sherlock homes would say “it boggles the
mind”
.
In the action-packed opening scene, Holmes (Robert Downey Jr.) and Watson (Jude Law) are on the tail of occult "sorcerer" Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong). Their pursuit continues beyond the grave, hampered by criminal seductress Iren Adler (Rachel McAdams) and Scotland Yard’s semi-bumbling Chief Inspector Lestrade (Eddie Marsan). This is not the intellectual brain teaser of other known Holmes sagas nor is it the super sleuthing of past Holmes performances ranging from the likes of Basil Rathbone, Peter Cushing, Christopher Plummer, Nicol Williamson and even Michael Caine. Rather Downey’s is a buff, brawling, self medicating, masochistic and supremely reclusive Holmes, humorously conducting experiments on himself and Watson’s bulldog.
I think kids might really enjoy this movie but balk at the action figure.
The first part of the movie sets up Holmes as an intellectual pugilist in typical Ritchie stylistic approach; over the top camera angles diagramming different punches in slow motion only to be re-enacted in real time as Holmes slugs the crap out of his opponent. This fighting tactic, seemingly set up to be used at the climax, is abandoned early in the flick, leaving the audience expecting the villain to get his just desserts that way. It just doesn’t happen. The movie seems to diffuse its intentions at every chance. Where it could’ve been witty it remained simply smart-alecky, where over the top action seemed required it became only sufficiently “action-y”, the plot sagged in the middle and the performances were merely lackluster staying on an even keel where a higher manic energy would’ve provided much more satisfactory entertainment. The range of music supporting the scenes felt plucked from different movies; an Irish jig here and somber tones there.
Kudos must go to Downey as he takes on every role with some sort of vim and vigor, but where his Tony Stark in Iron Man jumped out of the screen at you, this Sherlock is more laid back. Amidst unintelligible lines we’re invited to guess about his instincts. Law’s Watson is not the bumbler of his predecessors’ versions but an ass-kicking sidekick that verbally spars with Holmes on every level. Downey and Law do an impeccable job but there’s too much time spent on their ‘bromantic’ bickering, as when Holmes sabotages the relationship with Watson’s fiancé. McAdams (The Notebook) is adequate as the decoy love interest for Holmes, and Marsan (Happy go Lucky) shines in dim-wittedly comic fashion. Mark Strong (Body of Lies), looking like a demonic Andy Garcia, depicts one of the most evil villains ever.
Despite the cool decay-meets-reconstruction look of England this film’s core remains mediocre at best. It picks up the pace for a knock down drag out slug fest then spends too time setting up more plot and countless clues. When old hat conventions mingles with new ideas and technology it’s got to be something utterly fantastic in order to keep us engaged. Sherlock Holmes has a been-there-done-that sensibility with its muddled action, muffled dialogue, convoluted plot, and just run of the mill acting. The best part was Holmes’s summation as he fits all the mystery’s puzzle pieces together.
Riding on the coattails of a nemesis set-up near the end, Watson and Holmes smugly know what’s going on and why, whereas we don’t get to. It’s as if the filmmakers decided on an in joke that they’re not going to let us in on until we get to the sequel. I can only hope that the next Sherlock Holmes gets revved up a notch.
Sherlock Holmes
Starring Robert Downey Jr., Jude Law, Mark Strong, Rachel McAdams, Eddie Marsan
Directed by Guy Ritchie
2 stars
Friday, January 22, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment